Author Topic: House GOP offers stopgap funding  (Read 395 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 383,206
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
House GOP offers stopgap funding
« on: September 10, 2014, 01:48:10 am »
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=93FE6178-3E64-4596-AA9C-E23C45A0B88D



House GOP offers stopgap funding
By: David Rogers
September 9, 2014 08:38 PM EDT

House Republicans rolled out a stopgap spending bill to keep the government funded through Dec. 11 but also reshaping the budget landscape in a manner that tilts toward the GOP if it should win control of the Senate in November.

Included are extensions of the Internet Tax Freedom Act, as well as authority for the Export-Import Bank to continue its operations past Oct. 1. And the White House would get all of its $88 million request for new funding to cope with the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

But as filed late Tuesday, the bill provides only a temporary solution to the threat of new domestic spending cuts that could be triggered in January. At the same time the GOP allows for up to $85.1 billion in overseas contingency funds for the military— $26.5 billion more than President Barack Obama has requested for the new fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.

Given the increased U.S. military role already in the Middle East and Obama’s speech to the nation Wednesday evening, Republicans believe the greater reserve is prudent. But it also sets up a political situation — depending on November’s elections — where it will be that much easier for the GOP to simply extend the continuing resolution (CR) past Dec. 11.

In introducing the 21-page bill, House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.) made clear that he still wants to complete a more detailed appropriations agreement—not a full-year CR.

“This is a temporary, imperfect measure that does not reflect the changing needs of the nation or new budget priorities,” Rogers said. “In order to adequately address the country’s real and urgent budgetary requirements, it is imperative that Congress fulfill its Constitutional duty and enact actual, line-by-line Appropriations legislation for the next fiscal year.”

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) is hoping that Rogers’ logic prevails, whatever the election outcome. But with the high defense numbers and no fix on the domestic side, the draft CR is so favorable to GOP priorities that it will be tempting for conservatives favoring the simpler route of a full-year CR.

House floor debate is expected Thursday morning, and by including an extension for the Export-Import Bank, Republicans are hoping to win business support as well as important Democratic votes.

As now drafted the authorization would run nine-months through June 30, 2015. The extension of the Internet tax legislation is much shorter and would expire with the CR on Dec. 11.

Mindful of his conservative wing, Rogers emphasized Tuesday night that the bill was “clean” of major changes in federal policy. So clean, in fact, that earlier drafts this week had even proposed to cut in half the president’s request for new funding to address the Ebola threat.

Most simply, the House approach is to effectively take 2014 forward into the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

Rogers sets the total spending target at $1.012 trillion and uses an across-the-board cut from both defense and domestic programs to stay in this limit set by the budget agreement in December 2013. But by the same logic, he ends up freezing the overseas contingency (OCO) funds for the military at a level even higher than what his own committee had recommended for 2015.

This ignores major changes in the past year, and there is some question as to whether Obama has to continue spending that OCO money — or it is simply there as a reserve.

But the differences are big. The $85.1 billion number compares with $79.4 billion in the House-passed appropriations bill for the Defense Department this past summer. And Obama submitted a revised request in June that had proposed $58.6 billion instead, given the reduced U.S. military presence in Afghanistan,

Now depending on what follows the president’s speech Wednesday night, some of those OCO funds will surely be more in demand. But the $26.5 billion difference is greater than some entire cabinet departments.
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34